Rudolf Bultmann(1884-1976)
Rudolf Bultmann(1884-1976)
Bultmann was convinced that the narratives of the life of Jesus were offering theology in story form,
rather than historical events and, largely inaccurate, quotations from Jesus.
Spiritual messages were taught in the familiar language of ancient myth,
which has little meaning today. For example, he said:
Jesus Christ is certainly presented as the Son of God, a pre-existent divine being,
and therefore to that extent a mythical figure.
But he is also a concrete figure of history, Jesus of Nazareth.
His life is more than a mythical event, it is a human life which ended in the tragedy of the crucifixion.
Nevertheless, Bultmann insisted that the Christian message was not to be rejected by modern audiences,
however, but given explanation so it could be understood today.
Faith must be a determined vital act of will, not a culling and extolling of ancient proofs.
His book "Jesus and the Word (1926)", expressed serious skepticism
regarding the New Testament as a reliable source for Jesus' life story.
Throughout the 1930s, he published numerous works and become widely known for his goal of demythologization,
the process of separating the historical Jesus from the christological descriptions and legends,
which Bultmann believed became attached to Jesus through the writings of
Saint Paul, the Gospel writers, and the early Church Fathers.
In 1941, he published a famous commentary on the Gospel of John.
Bultmann distinguished between two kinds of history: historic and historical".
The latter has a mythical quality which transcends mere facts.
Thus, the Crucifixion of the Christ was historic,
in the sense that it was an event that transcends the "crucifixion of Jesus of Nazareth.
He was careful, however, to distinguish between the demythologization of the Christian texts and issues of faith.
For Bultmann, the essence of faith transcends what can be historically known.
One can never "know" as a matter of historical fact that "Christ is Lord."
However, in response to God's call through His Word, one can respond to Jesus as Lord with certainty, as a proposition of faith.
Bultmann took sharp issue with earlier biblical critics such as D. F. Strauss,
who, like Bultmann, identified the mythical aspects of Christian faith but also rejected them outright because they were unscientific.
For example, Bultmann rejected the historicity of the Resurrection, but not its spiritual significance.
An historical fact which involves a resurrection from the dead is utterly inconceivable,he admitted.
For him, the Easter event is not something that happened to the Jesus of history,
but something that happened to the disciples, who came to believe that Jesus had been resurrected.
Moreover, the resurrected Jesus is indeed a living presence in the lives of Christians.
Bultmann's approach was thus not to reject the mythical, but to reinterpret it in modern terms.
In his view the "final judgment" is not an event in history,
but an event which takes place within the heart of each person as he or she responds to the call of God in each moment.
Humans experience either Heaven or Hell in each moment, and faith means radical obedience to God in the present.
For Bultmann, to be "saved" is not a matter of sacraments and creedal formulas so much as it is to base our existence on God,
rather than merely getting by in the world.
True Christian freedom means following one's inner conscience,
rather than conforming to oppressive or corrupt social order.